06-05-2018, 02:49 PM
(06-05-2018, 02:35 PM)bfine32 Wrote: The answer to both are not no. Throwing this lower court decision out could easily keep another abortion from happening; as lawyers cannot point to precedence.
Seems you're trying overly hard on this one.
Abortions are still allowed under a nation wide court order while similar cases work through the court system. Those lawyers don't need precedent currently they just need to point to the court order until the supreme court is eventually forced to make a decision on a similar case.
Avoided precedent, didn't "save children".
