SCOTUS Rules About Colorodo Baker

[Dill]

(06-04-2018, 08:05 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I think they had to, given the way the Colorado court handled the case. My understanding is the the gay couple could have purchased a ready-made cake, so they were not being refused service. They just could not compel the "artist" to make gay art.

Interesting how the Baker's case is founded upon an appeal to free speech--artistic free speech.
Art alters the nature of all manner of otherwise illegal exchanges. E.g., prostitution is illegal everywhere but Nevada, but paying people for sex in front of a camera is legal because it is "art" is legal in many states.

So your assertion is that it matters who gets appointed to SCOTUS if your desire is for them NOT to follow the rule of law, but rule on personal beliefs? Outside of that the comment makes 0 sense. 

???? How do you get from an observation about the legal status of artistic free speech to a claim about SCOTUS appointments and a desire "NOT to follow the rule of law????