Indy game thoughts

[*Synric*]

(09-04-2015, 02:24 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: 1. Oh lord....it wasn't very nice. It was a bad play by the DE
2. Horse shoes and hand grenades.
3. That's poor gap discipline. He got completely washed out. 
4. OT never blocks him.
5. Wasn't great, but didn't have to be. Hunt has to stop and think what to do.
6. Unblocked. That's my point. His good plays are largely this variety.
7. That was a TE. Nice try though. 
8. That's why they make subpackages. Carter only has to contribute on passing downs to be valuable. It's the most important thing a defender can do right now. If Carter only sees 10 snaps as a pure pass rusher a week,  that's a win. 

1. He was there I've seen Dunlap miss quite a few of those too. Offensive players make plays too.
3. He was not washed out he was inside his gap rushing right and tried to make a play back to the left hell of a lot harder than you think.
4. You are right TE got him I see it was BT that got initially hit by the tackle and came back for hunt who also was pushing on that inside gap.
5. Hunt initially won and the TE made a nice recovery offensive players make great plays too.
6. It was a backside play he wasn't in front of it...that was an excellent play by Hunt saying it was bad is very telling.
7. Yes TE still won still there missed the tackle...like I said positive and negative.

Carter still has to be able to play in the base defense like Gillberry. how can you chance him on the field if he can't play whatever position he subbed for on the field. Don't get me wrong I want him and maybe they can teach him to play some linebacker but until then he's still a liability.