Indy game thoughts

[djs7685]

(09-04-2015, 02:46 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: You understand my point about Brady, he did beat out anyone, he was not starting until Bledsoe gets hurt. He took the opportunity and the rest is history.

Brady was a bad example, but I see you ignored the other two Warner and Harrison.

My point about being dumbfounded is simple. It is one thing for a mistake to be made by ML on a tough cut decision. It is another if a person is dumbfounded the person was even considered and what alone makes the team.

Brady was a terrible example, especially since he has nothing to do with what a DE can do at that age.

I didn't "ignore" the other 2, I just found the Brady comparison to be hilarious since he won 3 Super Bowls by the time you claimed those 3 guys weren't in the league or "showed zero promise". I don't know, your words, not mine.

Kurt Warner led the league in TD passes at 28.
James Harrison was seeing play time in Pittsburgh at 28.
Tom Brady won 3 Super Bowls by 28.

I'm sorry, I disagree with your assessment that those guys all showed "zero promise" or weren't in the league at 28. All of them were in the league, so I'm not sure why you even included that portion of your statement.

None of these guys have ANYTHING to do with Margus Hunt though, so I don't even know why I'm wasting time with this. Pointless argument is pointless. It's impossible to project Hunt's career based on any of those players. If you could show me some "project picks" that were 4-3 DEs that started to catch on after turning 28, then you'd be onto something.