06-11-2018, 11:46 AM
Since a few of you are in Ohio, I was curious how you felt about this case. Opinion here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-980_f2q3.pdf
What HUSTED, OHIO SECRETARY OF STATE v. A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE ET AL. is all about, is that the purging of inactive voters from the rolls. It's a statutory interpretation for the NVRA, and not a constitutional one, so this is something that can be changed legislatively. I'm curious, though, how people feel about people being purged from the voting rolls overall.
What HUSTED, OHIO SECRETARY OF STATE v. A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE ET AL. is all about, is that the purging of inactive voters from the rolls. It's a statutory interpretation for the NVRA, and not a constitutional one, so this is something that can be changed legislatively. I'm curious, though, how people feel about people being purged from the voting rolls overall.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
