Indy game thoughts

[RoyleRedlegs]

(09-04-2015, 02:38 PM)Synric Wrote: 1. He was there I've seen Dunlap miss quite a few of those too. Offensive players make plays too.
3. He was not washed out he was inside his gap rushing right and tried to make a play back to the left hell of a lot harder than you think.
4. You are right TE got him I see it was BT that got initially hit by the tackle and came back for hunt who also was pushing on that inside gap.
5. Hunt initially won and the TE made a nice recovery offensive players make great plays too.
6. It was a backside play he wasn't in front of it...that was an excellent play by Hunt saying it was bad is very telling.
7. Yes TE still won still there missed the tackle...like I said positive and negative.

Carter still has to be able to play in the base defense like Gillberry.  how can you chance him on the field if he can't play whatever position he subbed for on the field. Don't get me wrong I want him and maybe they can teach him to play some linebacker but until then he's still a liability.

1. And those are bad plays by Dunlap but very few and far between. Usually on plays it takes a player of his caliber to even get to...And the QB was ducking. He was giving up...Hunt WHIFFED. WHIFFED.


3. ....I don't think you know what gap discipline or washing out is.

4. Yes. He got blocked by a TE...again

5. Hunt had his chance before the TE touched him. He just has no clue what to do...besides, isn't the benefit of a big dude like Hunt that a TE shouldn't be able to one-arm him out of the play?

6. I never said it was bad. I said he was unblocked. Like almost all of his good plays. You are ridiculous. 

7. Yes he beat a TE. Is this what you have gotten down to? Celebrating him beating a TE? 

Why does Carter have to play in the base defense? Answer: he doesn't. He is a pass rusher. He isn't a liability. You send him out on 3rd and long. If they see him and choose to run on 3rd and long...that's the offenses fault because he's not a push over.