06-15-2018, 12:06 PM
(06-15-2018, 11:31 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: The DOJ Inspector General's conclusion that agents weren't acting on political bias is a bit puzzling. While agents were labeled as insubordinate, and violating policy, the IG concluded that the agents didn't show any political bias, despite damning test messages between agents. Messages such as the ones between Lisa Page " (Trump's) not ever going to ever become President, right?" and "Right?", and Peter Strzok "No. No he's not. We'll stop it."
I'll let everyone draw their own conclusions, as to weather those communications show any indications of bias or not.
https://www.npr.org/2018/06/15/620135227/the-huge-justice-department-ig-report-is-out-what-comes-next
Someone making statements that show a bias does not mean their work was necessarily impacted by that or that decisions made by others around them were affected by it. The texts are evidence that they were biased in what they said to each other, but they are not enough to say that the decisions made by the investigative team were improperly biased.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
