IG Report: No bias?

[SunsetBengal]

(06-15-2018, 12:37 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: But is there evidence that bias affected his decision? The IG also concluded that the decision not to prosecute was the correct one. With that determination by the IG it is hard to argue the decision was made due to bias.

FTR: Investigators making biased statements should be removed, as they were when it was discovered, and their work reviewed. Biased statements do not automatically mean their work is biased, but it can and should call it into question. Everyone has bias, but openly expressing it can damage your work even if you don't introduce it into your actions and so it is stupid and grounds for removal from a project.

I agree with you on that, completely.  I'm pleased that members of Mueller's team have been dismissed, due to expressions of personal bias.  That falls right in line with the opinion that you expressed.  By that same logic, I feel like any projects that Peter Strzok has been involved with, should also be called into question.


The DOJ is supposed to be politically neutral, as in "justice is blind".  It's my opinion that agents that freely express personal bias in communications, and even perhaps are involved in inappropriate relationships, have no place in agencies that claim to hold themselves to the highest of standards.