IG Report: No bias?

[*bfine32*]

(06-19-2018, 02:08 PM)jj22 Wrote: Until someone can explain to me why they think the FBI/DOJ favored Hillary as they leaked about her being under investigation for over a year, and hid Trumps far more serious investigation then I can't support the FBI/DOJ favored Hillary argument. Personally I think it's ridiculous given all of us know how much was leaked by Comey/FBI/DOJ about Hillary during the campaign. Specifically leading up to the election when Comey again stated Hillary was back under investigation while ignoring Trumps investigation.

Trump supporters claiming this somehow was a grand scheme to elect Hillary and hurt Trump are struggling to deal with reality. If there was any bias, it was against Hillary, and facts and reality prove it.

But carry on trying to sell people on the idea that the FBI was pro Hillary. It reminds me of the saying "With friends like that, who needs enemy's"....

I suppose if one does not have the ability to read text messages then you cannot see how folks within each investigation favored Hillary; however, if one does have the ability to read text messages, he or she can easily see how members of the FBI working directly in the investigation favored Hillary.

Personally, I feel it is unfair to group anyone that feels there may have been inconsistencies in the Hillary investigation a Trump supporter. But I suppose that paints them as less rational.

Your assertion of which is/was "a far more serious investigation" can be disputed as well (but I suppose only by a Trump supporter). Sharing classified government documents over a personal non-secured server could be more serious than candidate Trump colluding with Russia. But to date only one of those two issues has been proven to have actually occurred.