SCOTUS rules on Travel Ban

[fredtoast]

(06-27-2018, 11:15 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: This gets into the argument that was before the court. Can what Trump said be used to identify (unlawful) discriminatory intent within the policy, even if it was not written with that explicitly included. It's not so much about taking him at his word; I don't think any of the Justices doubted Trump's word or most of us on here for that matter. The decision is whether or not Trump's word really matters if the policy is facially neutral. The answer they came to was no.

The Supreme Court recognized that Trump is a liar who will say anything to fire up his base.