Despite the detractors, Trump doing well

[*bfine32*]

(07-04-2018, 10:24 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: There are people that argue the action was not a good one because the president did not have the authority to take it without congressional approval. That is just one angle the attack can be viewed in a negative way.

Whether something is good or bad is always going to be subjective. This was kind of my point before we started getting into the minutae. Almost everything done by the administration can be seen, legitimately, as good or bad. It's an opinion.

And that's why I said it's going to be impossible to provide you with an example that meets your criteria and to be honest although it's a term folks hate to use it is a symptom of TDS (refusal to give credit where due) the other symptom is to blame him for everything that is wrong.

He worked with a coalition of France and England to retaliate against a country that used chemical gas against its own citizens and that country is a strong allies of the country that "helped" him win the election.  One has to dig, really, really deep to find fault in that; perhaps to the point of not viewing the situation rationally.