07-11-2018, 06:28 PM
too many political threads, not enough religious threads.
There is zero archeological evidence that Jesus existed.
Zero contemporary historians mention him. The ‘contemporary’ historians that do mention him came some years later. Josephus, Pliny, Tacitus & other’s that mention him (which is barely a mention) are considered fraudulent; that is to say, that it is accepted by today’s historians that where Jesus is mentioned in these writings, it was added some time later, sometimes centuries later, by someone else (not the original writer).
Jesus wasn’t even his name as Jesus is Roman(Latin?) for Joseph.
So yeah, countless Joseph’s probably lived throughout the ages, including the time of ‘Jesus’, but none as magical as the storied savior.
There is zero archeological evidence that Jesus existed.
Zero contemporary historians mention him. The ‘contemporary’ historians that do mention him came some years later. Josephus, Pliny, Tacitus & other’s that mention him (which is barely a mention) are considered fraudulent; that is to say, that it is accepted by today’s historians that where Jesus is mentioned in these writings, it was added some time later, sometimes centuries later, by someone else (not the original writer).
Jesus wasn’t even his name as Jesus is Roman(Latin?) for Joseph.
So yeah, countless Joseph’s probably lived throughout the ages, including the time of ‘Jesus’, but none as magical as the storied savior.
-That which we need most, will be found where we want to visit least.-
