There is no proof that Jesus existed

[*bfine32*]

(07-12-2018, 05:05 PM)GMDino Wrote: But there is also heat.  No sun, no heat, no water.


Then how was there water?


Then God said,  "Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together into one place, and  let the dry land appear"

But again, that's closer to something...just not evolution.



The sun was day one.  Unless there is light and dark with no sun.


We *could* say anything to make a religious story fit into science.  But this part of the story ignores the part of the reptiles that became the birds.  And if the authors knew about dinosaurs they would have surely mentioned them, I think.


Again, if we want to interpret it that way we can make anything fit in to the science.  The actual words of the story say god created man.  Period.  Not that god created something that became man...eventually.

I had a priest teach us one time that it was possible that god created primates and then somewhere along the god split the line to make "humans" which are more like him.  I shouldn't say he "taught" us that.  He talked about that during an informal Q&A while he was substitute teaching.  But it stuck with me.


Sure, we can stretch the story to make it "fit".  But it has little to do with "evolution".  Creation of the Universe? Eh, closer.  Not evolution.

But then I've seen enough History channel shows to know we can fit space aliens into our history to if we look at it right.

I just never got the need to MAKE it fit.  It is your* belief.  Stick with that.  Getting approval from science because it "kinda fits" doesn't help it be more believable.  If there is ever scientific proof that the creation story is true that would justify your* faith...but you* don't need the justification.





*"your" and "you" the universal not necessarily you personally.

Let's see if my motto of the board holds true:

How was the universe and life created started?