Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Arby's apologizes after officer is denied service for being a cop
#89
(09-05-2015, 04:11 PM)jakefromstatefarm Wrote: Yes, I do know what it means.  It's the difference between socialistic private property rights and libertrarian private property rights.

Someday you will actually have to explain something for anyone here to think you know anything.

So I'll ask again.  What does "private property rights" have to do with a business owner being able tovitimize anyone he wants any way he wants.  You support the right of businesses to vitimize people through discrimination, so why would I not assume that you alsio agree they should be able to do anything else they want to victimize people.

Since you only spew platitudes instead of insightful commentary it is really hard to understand what you mean.

Where do you draw the line regarding what "private property rights" should allow a business owner to do?  I really have no idea what your position is on this.  You act like discrimination is some super special privilege that should be held in higher regard than the other things that business owners have been stopped from doing to victimize people.





Messages In This Thread
RE: Arby's apologizes after officer is denied service for being a cop - fredtoast - 09-05-2015, 10:39 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)