07-31-2018, 06:31 PM
(07-31-2018, 05:36 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Likely a combination thereof.
Depends on the system.
No one. You go to a facility and it would be covered...
Canada's problems aren't because of single-payer. They are because they haven't invested the resources into their healthcare system to make it run properly.
If we had a medicare for all system, I imagine it would function in a similar fashion to medicare and I think that is a far easier sell. You get your tax funded coverage like with part A and the chance to pay for part B to cover more. You can also supplement it with private insurance (parts C and D), though the things covered under parts C and D would likely drive the cost of parts A and B down if they too were covered.
![[Image: ulVdgX6.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/ulVdgX6.jpg)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)