09-06-2015, 11:12 PM
(09-06-2015, 10:03 PM)jakefromstatefarm Wrote: Oh no....fred knows the details "very well".
1) 24 waiting period on inspections
Any site that is given notice of an inspection will be under constant surveillance for the 24 hour period so that nothing can be removed. It is also impossible to dismantle a centrifuge in 24 hours.
(09-06-2015, 10:03 PM)jakefromstatefarm Wrote: 2) Sanctions gone
Of course the sanctions are gone. the only purpose of the sanctions was to get the Iranians to negotiate. But if Iran violates the agreement the sanctions go back in place automatically.
(09-06-2015, 10:03 PM)jakefromstatefarm Wrote: 3) Kerry told lawmakers that negotiators said there was no better deal available, and since 2003 Iran has not pursued a nuclear bomb. If that's true, what do we need a deal for in the first place?
Not sure if this is a serious question. The point of the deal was to prevent Iran from pursuing a nuclear weaponms program. Don't know why you would even ask this question
(09-06-2015, 10:03 PM)jakefromstatefarm Wrote: 4) Anything Iran is "giving up" as a part of this deal is offset by the economic gain they will get because of the removal of sanctions.
Do you even understand what the term "negotiations" means? Do you even know the point of this deal. Iran has been prevented from pursuing a nuclear weapons program. How do they regain nuclear weapons by having the sanctions lifted? How could any deal have been possible if Iran never received anything in return for giving up the pursuit of a nuclear weapon?
(09-06-2015, 10:03 PM)jakefromstatefarm Wrote: 5) The White House is "comfortable" that Iran will self-inspect and deliver honest reports.
No they are not and you can not provide a link to the administration saying anything like this. The whole issue of "self-inspecting" has to do with the requirements of the International Atomic Energy Agency (not the White House). This deal is not between the United States and Iran. It is an international agreement between Iran and several other nations. Since this a multinational agreement the inspections will be carried out by an international agency instead of the United States.
The info you got from inside the echo chamber has since been questioned and has even been redacted from many early versions of the story. The leak claimed that Iranian scientists would be taking the samples, but in fact the IAEA has claimed that it is not uncommon for the Iranian scientists to actually take the samples with an IAEA inspector present.
