09-07-2015, 10:50 AM
(09-07-2015, 09:29 AM)Blutarsky Wrote:
The "study" proclaiming that 97% percent of scientists agreeing on man made climate change was debunked a couple years ago.The first link is the most telling. It doesn't even set out to debunk the 97%, it just so happened that when Purdue University polled scientists in this study, only 53% of scientists polled believed man was contributing to global warming.
In science there must be consensus, and there is none. 53% doesn't cut it.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/18/what-else-did-the-97-of-scientists-say/
http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/
The atmosphere contains approx 400ppm of Co2,...(that's my $1,000,000 to your $400 if you are unable to comprehend ppm), an increase of 120ppm since the start of the industrial revolution a little over 100yrs. ago. Even if it could be proven that this amount is causing said warming, then it's probably a good thing because we need a little more warmth to fend of the mini ice age that's coming.The sky isn't falling people. Just stop it.
The Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, in a position statement written by Chairman C.D. Idso, PhD, and Vice President K.E. Idso, PhD, stated the following in its 2008 publication "Carbon Dioxide and Global Warming: Where We Stand on the Issue," available at http://www.co2science.org:
Richard S. Lindzen, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), stated the following in his article, "Climate of Fear: Global Warming Alarmists Intimidate Dissenting Scientists into Silence," Wall Street Journal, Apr. 12, 2006:
John R. Christy, PhD, M.Div, Professor of Atmospheric Science and Director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama at Huntsville, provided the following testimony on Aug. 1, 2012 before the US Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, available at http://www.epw.senate.gov:
Willie Soon, PhD, Physicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, stated the following in his Nov. 2007 article “Implications of the Secondary Role of Carbon Dioxide and Methane Forcing in Climate Change: Past, Present, and Future,” published in Physical Geography:
Harrison H. Schmitt, PhD, Geologist, Honorary Associate Fellow of Engineering at the University of Wisconsin at Madison and former US Senator and NASA Astronaut, and William Happer, PhD, Professor of Physics at Princeton University, stated the following in their May 8, 2013 article "Harrison H. Schmitt and William Happer: In Defense of Carbon Dioxide," available at wsj.com:
Tim Ball, PhD, former Geography Professor at the University of Winnipeg, stated the following in his July 7, 2008 article "Alarmists Use Weather to Promote Global Warming Hoax," available at canadafreepress.com:
Don J. Easterbrook, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Geology at Western Washington University, stated the following in his June 28, 2014 article "Global Cooling Is Here," available at globalresearch.ca:
William Gray, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Science at Colorado State University, stated the following in his Apr. 7, 2010 article, "MIT Professor's Climate Change Op-Ed Proven False," available at http://www.globalwarmingheartland.org:
Roy W. Spencer, PhD, Principal Research Scientist at the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, stated the following in his Oct. 20, 2008 article "Global Warming as a Natural Response to Cloud Changes Associated with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation," available at http://www.drroyspencer.com:
Steven F. Hayward, PhD, FK Weyerhaeuser Fellow at the American Enterprise Instutute for Public Policy Research, stated the following in his Mar. 15, 2010 article "In Denial," available at http://www.aei.org:
The George C. Marshall Institute, a science and public policy organization, stated the following in its July 23, 2009 publication "The Cocktail Conversation Guide to Global Warming," available at http://www.marshall.org:
James M. Inhofe, United States Senator (R-OK), stated the following in his Sep. 25, 2006 speech "Hot & Cold Media Spin: A Challenge to Journalists Who Cover Global Warming,” available at http://www.epw.senate.gov:
The first link says that over 90% of scientists agree there has been global warming that has at least some contributions from humans... The stat is brought down, because they lump in farmers in that too...
"More than 90 percent of the 173 scientists and climatologists surveyed said they believed climate change was occurring, with more than 50 percent attributing climate change primarily to human activities. An additional 30 percent said they believed climate change was due to a combination of human activities and natural causes."
I can't read the 2nd link because I don't pay for it...
The 3rd link basically said that we didn't use any Russian scientists, and most of the scientists that were used were mostly in America, and some in Europe. Because they are all from "western" scientists it must be wrong!
The forbs article doesn't even say that the 97% of scientists agree is wrong...
The "mini ice age" that's coming is due to the suns cycles according to your link. It says an ice age will happen from 2030-2040, and we get a "mini ice age" for 10-12 years, because of the suns cycle... What's the point of even posting that? "Well global warming might be real, but there's a mini ice age that will go on for 10 to 12 years, and it happens every so often!"
Why would it be so hard to understand parts per million?
Do you even read the links that you posted?
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
