Driskel may see time with 1's

[*Nate (formerly eliminate08)*]

(08-18-2018, 10:14 AM)Daddy-O Wrote: Wow, pretty harsh!

Just because Driskel was not a household name doesn't mean he can't be successful.  To say he sucks is a little overboard considering every opportunity he's had has come with back-ups.  I've been to camp and watched him.  At least to this untrained eye he appears to be accurate and very mobile.  Put him with a the 1's and see what happens.

To be honest, I would much prefer to have him as a backup than Barkley.  The league has already seen what Barkley can do...meh.

Completely agree Daddy-O.

(08-18-2018, 10:28 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Umm... that’s probably Barkley lol

Damn, Driskel has a babe too though. Both are hot.

(08-18-2018, 03:51 PM)wolfkaosaun Wrote: I would be fine with it. Offensive line needs a lot more time on the field, and gives Driskel a shot at being QB 2. He looked much better than Barkley, but the 'weaker competition' conversation starts up there, so this will help.

I even thought last year that Driskel looked better than McCarron. Granted, it was a small sample size.

It was pretty clear to me that Driskel looked much better than AJM last Preseason.