09-10-2015, 11:07 AM
(09-10-2015, 11:02 AM)Brownshoe Wrote: Maybe not a good #2, but a good WR2. 712 yards and 10 TD isn't bad for a WR2. If you add in TEs though... he goes way down on the list.
But why wouldn't you add the TEs against the #1 receivers instead of the #2 receivers? Wouldn't that make more sense for teams like the Patriots and Seahawks at least? Gronk and Graham are much more comparable to #1s than #2s. In fact, they're easily the best receiver on their respective teams, so if anything you should be throwing them up on the #1 list.
That's what I was saying about this becoming awfully confusing if you don't compare them at their given positions.
