Bruce/Caitlin afraid of going to men's jail

[Mike M (the other one)]

(09-10-2015, 06:15 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: There is no conclusive evidence one way or the other at this time.  You should at least know this.


That is complete bullshit.  Homosexuality could very well be a multifactorial genetic disorder.  You just don't understand the "genetic" portion of multifactorial genetic disorder.



Addictive sexual behavior?  Heterosexuality would also qualify as an addictive sexual behavior.  So you're abandoning your multifactorial genetic disorder hypothesis so quickly?  Figures, since you didn't understand what you were talking about anyway.



Except for the fact homosexuality doesn't meet any of the criteria for a mental disorder the same as heterosexuality doesn't and for the same reasons.

*sighs

Waste of time again.

Yes I'm very well aware there is no evidence that supports your side.

I understand how MF genetics work. I said that if homosexuality was genetic, then it would most likely fall under the MF category because it doesn't really fit into any of the other genetic mutations and it mimics other MF disorders. You're the one denied it as a possibility.

Or are you denying that you said this?

(09-02-2015, 11:42 AM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Multifactorial disorders are only one of many types of genetic disorders.  You have zero evidence homosexuality is a multifactorial disorder instead of any of the other genetics disorders.  None.  Nada.  Zip.  Zilch.  Zero.  

You're line about heterosexuals has no point. I already stated many different types of sexual gratification that people get from various types of sex and that included both Heterosexuals and Homosexuals. So you really have no point there other than you are trying to say that heterosexuals have problems too, as a means to quantify homosexuality. Strawman argument sprinkled in with your favorite the argumentum ad hominem.

I didn't abandon that route, you made it very clear to me that it's not a possibility so I decided that there was no need to pursue that angle anymore. You brought up that it's possible for it to happen in the womb, I won't completely disagree with that, but it's not a true statement. 

Last but not least, which groups criteria do you wish to use to figure out if it is a disorder or not?