Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
F-35
#21
(10-02-2018, 04:34 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Yeah, I think the titanium armoring around the cockpit on an A-10 is rated for something like armor piercing 20+mm fire. Also designed to be able to fly missing an engine and half of a wing. It's pretty absurd.

Meanwhile the F-35 is vulnerable to being downed by 7.62 fire from an AK if it flies low, so it will literally never be doing that because nobody will risk losing their $120m fighter to small arms fire.

I suppose this fall under decision makers "wanting" something without understanding the consequences?
[Image: giphy.gif]
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.





Messages In This Thread
F-35 - TheLeonardLeap - 09-28-2018, 07:41 PM
RE: F-35 - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 09-28-2018, 08:30 PM
RE: F-35 - TheLeonardLeap - 09-28-2018, 09:23 PM
RE: F-35 - Benton - 10-01-2018, 10:23 AM
RE: F-35 - mallorian69 - 10-02-2018, 12:40 AM
RE: F-35 - Dill - 10-01-2018, 06:45 PM
RE: F-35 - Bengalzona - 10-01-2018, 07:32 PM
RE: F-35 - TheLeonardLeap - 10-01-2018, 10:39 PM
RE: F-35 - Bengalzona - 10-01-2018, 11:16 PM
RE: F-35 - Dill - 10-01-2018, 11:32 PM
RE: F-35 - TheLeonardLeap - 10-01-2018, 11:55 PM
RE: F-35 - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 10-02-2018, 01:59 AM
RE: F-35 - TheLeonardLeap - 10-02-2018, 02:28 AM
RE: F-35 - Dill - 10-02-2018, 10:15 AM
RE: F-35 - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 10-02-2018, 12:05 PM
RE: F-35 - Dill - 10-02-2018, 03:09 PM
RE: F-35 - TheLeonardLeap - 10-02-2018, 04:34 PM
RE: F-35 - GMDino - 10-03-2018, 09:38 AM
RE: F-35 - NATI BENGALS - 09-29-2018, 12:00 AM
RE: F-35 - TheLeonardLeap - 09-29-2018, 12:25 AM
RE: F-35 - michaelsean - 10-02-2018, 09:55 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)