Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0
#15
(10-15-2018, 11:02 AM)KillerGoose Wrote: Cincinnati doesn't have the LBers to go to a 3-4. You think the defense sucks now, just wait until the transition period from going to a 3-4 from a 4-3. Carl Lawson would be a good 3-4 OLB but there isn't really anyone else who would transition very well.

A 4-3 can still work really well. Cincinnati is weak at LBer and has bad scheming.

You have an all pro DT, a pro bowl DE, and can’t generate any pressure.

Even when they blitz it takes 5 seconds and AB is on the end zone
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - bengals67 - 10-15-2018, 10:58 AM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - Bengalbug - 10-15-2018, 12:48 PM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - J24 - 10-15-2018, 11:08 AM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - J24 - 10-15-2018, 11:20 AM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - Luvnit2 - 10-15-2018, 11:21 AM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - McC - 10-15-2018, 12:27 PM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - Joelist - 10-15-2018, 11:36 AM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - J24 - 10-15-2018, 11:41 AM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - Joelist - 10-15-2018, 02:24 PM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - Au165 - 10-15-2018, 02:42 PM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - Daddy-O - 10-15-2018, 12:32 PM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - McC - 10-15-2018, 02:12 PM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - McC - 10-15-2018, 02:26 PM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - PhilHos - 10-15-2018, 02:35 PM
RE: Baltimore 11 sacks/Bengals 0 - McC - 10-15-2018, 02:19 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)