Trump, liar liar pants on fire

[*bfine32*]

(10-23-2018, 02:30 PM)fredtoast Wrote: That is not a "fact" at all.  The group that is "most likely" to vote for Trump is the $50-$100K group where he got 50% of the vote and was 4 points ahead of Hillary.  In all the "more affluent" classes Trump drew a smaller percentage and Hillary drew more.


Like I said.  Learn to look at the numbers yourself instead of just repeating what FoxNews tells you.

This is headed down the same ridiculous "Fred Path" so this will be my last reply on the matter.

For of all the line you bolded that you were going to prove "wrong" stated the less money you made the more you favored Clinton. You tried to feebly counter this by pointing to folks on the high end of the spectrum where a larger percentage in each category voted for Trump and then somehow/someway the fact that Trump won with the largest voting population (50-99k) proves something.

Why did you not focus on the lower income numbers when talking about those who make less favored Clinton? And the feeble point I think you are failing to make can be disputed by Trump beating Hills by 1% in the 2nd highest category and 2% in the highest category.

FWIW, I will not rely on you or Fox News to explain to me how to read numbers.