Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Trump, liar liar pants on fire
#30
(10-23-2018, 06:41 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Did they use ignorant as a demographic? I both a chart showing the more successful in the demographic voted for Trump in an attempt to dispel the hateful  "ignorant folks vote for Trump" mantra and I'm met with "that doesn't count". 

I get it. You and others came up on the losing end and one of the ways you can ease your pain is to assert: "Well, the ignorant voted opposite of me." Save the hate. 

I didn't vote for Obama; yet he won 2 elections and never did I say "It's because folks less intelligent than I voted for him".

LOL did you just accuse me of "hate"?  Again?

So now it's "the more successful in the demographic", in the graph you posted after the fact.  There is no generic demographic of "the successful." There is no poll showing that X percent of blacks and y percent of Catholics and z percent of "the successful" voted for any candidate.

"Ignorant" is your term, not mine.  But Trump defenders/supporters are very sensitive to that charge. Why?

And of course you didn't say Obama won because less intelligent voters voted for him.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]





Messages In This Thread
RE: Trump, liar liar pants on fire - Dill - 10-22-2018, 10:11 PM
RE: Trump, liar liar pants on fire - Dill - 10-23-2018, 06:34 PM
RE: Trump, liar liar pants on fire - Dill - 10-23-2018, 07:06 PM
RE: Trump, liar liar pants on fire - Dill - 10-24-2018, 06:17 PM
RE: Trump, liar liar pants on fire - Dill - 10-24-2018, 10:54 PM
RE: Trump, liar liar pants on fire - Dill - 10-24-2018, 11:20 PM
RE: Trump, liar liar pants on fire - Dill - 10-23-2018, 08:06 PM
RE: Trump, liar liar pants on fire - Dill - 10-23-2018, 07:51 PM
RE: Trump, liar liar pants on fire - Dill - 10-23-2018, 12:28 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)