David Bell new manager

[Hoofhearted]

(10-25-2018, 02:08 PM)fredtoast Wrote: The claim that he was hired based on nepotism implies that he was not hired for his actual abilities, and adding the word "more" implies that the Reds are continuing with a process that has produced failure.


If I am wrong then please explain why you celebrate "more nepotism".

Well, what was the hiring process for Price again? Not much of any. I will give them credit for having a much better process this time around, but forgive me for not believing them nailed down their hiring process to the FO beliefs/way they want to do business. 

The more sentiment is line with how they've been doing business since 2005: Wins: 1077 Losses: 1191 Average: .0475%. Does this speak to a flawless process? Below .500 for over a decade would probably be closer to failure than success, even with the 2012 campaign. 

Who knows if they're continuing with the process (I think the remainder of his staff will be telling), but I don't know how someone can say say the way the Reds have been doing business sine Bob C took over is anything less than a failure.