10-31-2018, 11:02 AM
What is interesting to me is that, if one could prove that he received far more than the 1 million he claimed he was given to start his business does him selling that lie amount to fraud? He used a false narrative to dupe investors into believing in his "system" and in his general business acumen and therefor trusting him. If he lied about the results of said system in the advertising one would think it would fall under false advertising at the least. Would be interesting if this suit would be able to subpoena more of his financial records using this angle. My guess is he would settle before allowing that information to get out though.
