Defense (Deep-Dive Analysis using PFF Ratings)

[THE PISTONS]

(11-03-2018, 11:59 PM)hollodero Wrote: OK, overall that seems to show what many thought anyway. I just have one minor question.


So 91.0 and not enough snaps to be rated... so why is he rated? My question is a bit less dull than that, I see him having not much playtime and he also had that one huge play - that probably contributes to that rating in a pretty overproportional manner. I don't know how PFF rates, but using that elite tag seems grossly distorted.

Not enough snaps to be rated at the position...say #3 among safeties.

Kinda like in Baseball how you have a batting average, but not enough at bats to qualify for the batting title.

Interestingly his big play was early in the year. His rating has continued to be high the whole season. Other Bengals ratings have generally fallen.