Borderline Bar & Grill Shooting

[GMDino]

(11-09-2018, 12:36 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Not at all, as I know what the term means in the context in which it was written.  Many anti-gun people like to quote this part of the 2A, they are wrong every time.

Wow! I had no IDEA you were over 200 years old!

(11-09-2018, 12:36 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Why would someone need a piece of paper to prove they know how to safely handle a firearm?  I know gun owners who've never taken a safety course and are highly responsible when it comes to gun safety.

LMAO! Yes, a person without the knowledge of algebra and physics voting is the same as anyone being able to buy a weapon and receive no training. You're a hoot.

But it was your false equivalency question.

(11-09-2018, 12:36 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: We already have limits set on our right to own a firearm.  Further limits, such as those imposed in CA, have had zero effect on gun violence.  Gun ownership laws only affect those who are inclined to obey the law.  What does a criminal who's going to kill someone care if the gun they possess isn't legal to own in CA?  "Assault weapons" are used in fewer homicides than fists, clubs or knives, yet we always hear about the need to ban them.  This rather indicates that saving lives is not the real intent of gun control.

I keep forgetting that only when it comes to gun laws does the "criminals don't obey laws" argument come into play.

My bad.

Have a great weekend!