11-27-2018, 05:50 PM
(11-27-2018, 05:13 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Understood. The purpose was to illustrate that one side doesn't have a monopoly on these types of actions (POTUS feigning ignorance). I apologize the example provided fell short. I'll see if I can scrub the history books and find one that does pass muster in my feeble attemt to show this is an nonpartisan action.
Right now, it's not a nonpartisan issue, but a Trump issue.
One can take issue with Hillary's emails - or use Hillary's emails in an attempt to normalize "feigning ignorance" by a POTUS. But one can't really do both without appearing to be driven by partisanry rather than objectivity and fairness. If Hillary's emails shine a bad light on Obama, then there's no point denying the awful light on Trump.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)