09-17-2015, 03:11 PM
(09-17-2015, 03:07 PM)bfine32 Wrote: As I said, this point makes sense if she simply sued for a refund of the service, but she sued for pain, suffering, and stress because she has to raise a child that is different.
Luckily, unlike some here, the Judge saw this for what is was and threw it out of court.
If you were the victim of medical malpractice that left you paralyzed woulod you be satisfied just to get a refund for what you paid the doctor?
And you have no idea what the judge said.
Attorneys for the sperm bank had argued that “wrongful birth” suits typically apply to cases where the child is born with a birth defect that doctors should have warned parents about; in this case, the child was healthy. Cramblett had also sought damages for a “breach of warranty.” The judge rejected both claims, but said that Cramblett could refile the suit as a “negligence claim.”
