Alex Redmond

[*Synric*]

(12-01-2018, 02:14 PM)fredtoast Wrote: If that wassd the problem then they would have looked at his '09 tape and paid him very well.

The fact is that every team look at the 100+ snaps that he played in 2010 and agreed that he was not worth more than a league minimum contract.  If you are going to say Alexander was stupid then you are going to have to say every team in the league was stupid.

I can understand you trying to claim you are smarter than Alexander, but I am going to call BS when you try to claim you are smarter than every coach in the league.

Mathis did not deserve to start or get a lot of playing time in 2010.  He just was not that good.  Every coach in the league saw his level of play and agreed.  Luckily for the Eagles he got back in shape and played more like he did in '09 before he was injured.

I claim I'm smarter than PA when? 

 I said it was stupid to keep Livings over Mathis and it was...stop trying to put words in my mouth.

Evans Mathis IMMEDIATELY after leaving Cincy became the best guard in football. Paul Alexander failed to recognize talent and played a player that was a lot worse over him. He kept putting in Livings over Mathis. Evan Mathis went on to prove he should have gotten the playing time in Cincy not Livings. 


I've shown you evidence from articles yet your only argument is that no one gave him a huge contract. The PFF article stated Evans could be the steal of free agency and guess what he was....



If you want to prove yourself right show me one article one person that said Evan Mathis didn't play well in Cincy. Only you are saying this you have no evidence no stats nothing.

I'll make a Sig bet you cant.