12-02-2018, 06:23 PM
(12-02-2018, 06:20 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: That's assuming that the Blackburns will be different than Mike. Since 2014, they've been heavily involved in the day to day operations of this franchise, and I haven't noticed any real difference. That's not to say that things won't change when Mike is completely out of the picture...just that I'm not convinced or very confident that it will happen to any great degree.
Bingo except you seem to have a bit more faith in the rest of the clan than I do . The bottom line is that it's always going to be profitable owning an NFL franchise and winning is completely irrelevant. If winning had ANYTHING AT ALL to do with profitability the Bengals (and Browns) would have been out of business long ago.
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
