12-05-2018, 05:32 PM
Quoting a racial group as a demographic is one thing. However, the thread was presented as iff the recent layoffs only impacted one racial demographic, with the insinuation that that racial graphic was the only one which voted for the current administration. Neither of these statements is true as an absolute. In that light, the previous thread was viewed as "race baiting". We do not permit that.
The context of this thread, that the Mod who closed the other thread somehow made a mistake, is flawed. Therefore, this thread is being closed as well. I will keep it open long enough for you to read this, however no new posts will be accepted in the thread.
To jj22: the original opst in the first thread would have been perfectly fine and reasonable without the word "white" thrown in. These layoffs did not just impact the white middle class. I personally know people of other races who are affected by this. It is not a racial thing to begin with.
The context of this thread, that the Mod who closed the other thread somehow made a mistake, is flawed. Therefore, this thread is being closed as well. I will keep it open long enough for you to read this, however no new posts will be accepted in the thread.
To jj22: the original opst in the first thread would have been perfectly fine and reasonable without the word "white" thrown in. These layoffs did not just impact the white middle class. I personally know people of other races who are affected by this. It is not a racial thing to begin with.
![[Image: 416686247_404249095282684_84217049823664...e=659A7198]](https://scontent.fphx1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/416686247_404249095282684_8421704982366424390_n.jpg?_nc_cat=102&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=3635dc&_nc_ohc=p8hMrwwk1IoAX8mnFLJ&_nc_ht=scontent.fphx1-2.fna&oh=00_AfBXs4gKHr4knFejO874dfV3zzLd_bq4GiUqHxGWFlwbug&oe=659A7198)
