Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Our Our 1st Round CB's are apparantly allergic to interceptions
#25
(12-07-2018, 12:43 PM)Au165 Wrote: Most analytics people will tell you interceptions are somewhat of a luck thing rather than skill. You obviously want turnovers and our guys have had shots at interceptions, especially ones that have hit them, but there are a lot of things that go into INTs that are outside the CB's control. In general interceptions have gone down the last couple decades with the move to the spread/screen schemes so many teams run. Again, not saying we shouldn't have more but the perception of what is "a lot" of interceptions is skewed.

2017 - 25 players in the league had more than 3 interceptions.
2016 - 20 players in the league had more than 3 interceptions.
2015 - 23 players in the league had more than 3 interceptions.

If we go back 10 years...

2008- 28 players in the league had more than 3 interceptions.
2007- 40 players in the league had more than 3 interceptions.
2006- 32 players in the league had more than 3 interceptions.

Now in comparison if we jump back 20 years or so...

2000 - 45 players in the league had more than 3 interceptions.
1999 - 43 players in the league had more than 3 interceptions.
1998 - 41 players in the league had more than 3 interceptions.

That's why I included the PD's stat too. That's not a 'luck' stat.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Our Our 1st Round CB's are apparantly allergic to interceptions - THE PISTONS - 12-07-2018, 12:44 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)