Keith Ellison

[GMDino]

(12-11-2018, 06:58 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: As well as her pointing out that she had provided evidence that backed up her claim.

Evidence of something happening to her.  The evidence that "backed up her claim" was the video she said she had and her two other witnesses.  None of which was provided during the investigation.

I'm assuming that you would want to see more than just a bruise or an injury before you found someone guilty.

(12-11-2018, 06:58 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Neither do I.  I didn't bring up Kavanaugh though, you just did.

Again, I didn't bring up Kavanaugh,

Oh!  So in your very first accusatory post when you mentioned Cruz and, well, let's just read what you wrote:

(12-11-2018, 01:35 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Just wondering, as I recall Cruz being harassed by far left activists that state they believe survivors, how Keith Ellison, accused domestic abuser, was elected the AG of Minnesota.  Is it OK to beat women if you're a Democrat?  Is it OK to not believe survivors if their attacker was a Democrat (I'm looking at you Bill Clinton).  While obviously tongue in cheek the implications of this are rather disturbing.  Apparently even believing women has become a partisan exercise.  You shut the hell up Paula Jones!

First: "obviously tongue and cheek"     Great CYA there sir!

But anyway, when you brought up Cruz which "survivor" were you referring to?

I bet it was Dr. Ford who accused Kavanaugh...even if you "didn't bring him up".  

(12-11-2018, 06:58 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: so I'm wondering where you're getting the supposed hyperbole from.

I did bring up Clinton and your continued refusal to publicly state whether you believed the women who made accusation against him.  Is that hyperbole?

I'm sure he will, as soon as he finds some.  Maybe help him out and actually point some out in this thread?  I'm sure that guy won't hold his breath.

I put the hyperbole in bold in the statement I responded to.  I figured the hyperbole guy would be here to say something about it.  Maybe only Democrats use it in his view?

Or maybe it's just that you want to paint me as something with no proof so you just keep pounding a point until there is no point?  So you just keep bringing up Clinton?

I certainly didn't expect him to find that you made a mistake or used hyperbole...no sir.  That would be like saying you were wro....well...let's just say not 100% right.  


The point of the matter is you wanted to accuse "democrats" of not treating Ellison the same as...well...you didn't "bring up" Kavanaugh but instead mentioned others being harassed for their view on accusers.  And, when shown that no one said Kavanaugh was guilty but wanted an investigation and that Ellison had an investigation and the evidence wasn't there, you turned it into...Clinton?  I dunno.  You're all over the place here.

And I didn't vote for Ellison for AG of Minn. So maybe we have members from there you were specifically looking for answers from?

I'm sure you'll clearly explain yourself and how you were right and everyone leftists were wrong.  I'll wait patiently.