12-13-2018, 09:34 PM
(12-13-2018, 08:19 PM)bfine32 Wrote: It is the same nationally after all. Or you can admit there's an obvious bias in the 2 issues.
It is not and has never been the same nationally. One was for a lifetime appointment to the U S Supreme Court and the other was for an elected State position.
You have to live in an echo chamber to claim they should have both been treated with the same notoriety.
And, of course, one could not demand or expect any type of public hearing when she was refusing to cooperate.
