09-18-2015, 09:02 PM
(09-18-2015, 08:07 PM)hollodero Wrote: I like the trade. It seems to make sense regarding your roster.
That's why I believe rating a trade by just mentioning the traded players doesn't really work. You just can compare pure isolated value and ignore the advantage to the trader's roster. But in a good trade, none of the participants is the loser. The loser of a good trade is the rest of the league.
Just 2 cents. Carry on.
This was my thinking. I went with zero RB strategy through round 3 to load myself with the best talent available at WR, unless a dynamic RB fell my way. This gave me roster flexibility in that I had ridiculous talent at the WR position, and a few of my bench receivers were either WR3 or close WR2 talent. So the Calvin Johnson trade cost me my RB3 when I was mostly starting a WR in my flex. Thus giving me a WR1 in both WR slots, 2 potential RB1's in my RB slots(if Murray can be better utilize and perform), and IMO what will be the hands down best fantasy QB. I essentially got 5 first 3 round of the draft players. So whether you like the players or not, for week 2 I managed to gain a slew of early round players.
If I can turn Murray in a more reliable back then fantastic.
