Keith Ellison

[*bfine32*]

(12-17-2018, 11:34 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Not sure what your point is.  There is a difference between the actions of the two accusers.  I explained why one seems to be more likely lying than the other.  I provide facts to back up my position, not just political bias.  The woman claimed to have a video that would PROVE SHE WAS NOT LYING and refused to provide the video.

On the other hand you are so deep in your right wing echo chamber that you kept arguing that Ford's witnesses contradicted her claims when in fact Leland Kiaser told the Senate Judiciary Committee that she believed Ford's claim 

I don't think either woman had enough evidence to punish either of the men, but at least I waited until I heard the evidence to decide, and I based my decision on facts instead of speaking points from the echo chamber of my party.

I think the point is quite simple. Ford had nobody back her allegations of assault; matter of fact every "witness" she pointed to has no idea what she is talking about. She also doesn't know where or when the assault occurred, nor mentioned Kavanaugh by name when discussing the assault with medical professionals.

But Fred finds her more believable that someone who claimed they had a video and didn't release it, but has provided medicals records where she shared where, when, and by whom she was assault and somehow Fred expects onlookers to believe he is a beacon of neutrality.