Keith Ellison

[*bfine32*]

(12-17-2018, 02:16 PM)GMDino Wrote: That's not what you said.  You said:


So I showed two people who "she pointed to" that did indeed have an "idea what she was talking about".

Then I provided a link to a video that showed that she did indeed know where and had answers to other questions (not posed).

But admitting that evidence was presented to prove your statement false would almost like be admitting you were wrong...not something I expect to happen.

As to you're next diversion question I've already commented on Ellison's accuser.  She made claims that her injuries were caused by him.  She claimed she had video and two witnesses to the abuse.  She did not provide the video and the witnesses refused to cooperate.

That's doesn't make he a "liar" it makes her someone who claimed she had evidence and did not present it.  Whether she is lying or not I cannot say.

Yes they know nothing of the incident, to which, MS Ford is referring. The fact that they believe her, doesn't change that fact.  Like many here they may be biased in their beliefs.

So talking about the Ellison accuser in a thread about Ellison's accuser is a diversion?

I didn't asked was she lying or not. I asked what made MS Ford's accusation to be less likely a lie. Hell maybe Pat was on to something.