Keith Ellison

[GMDino]

(12-17-2018, 02:56 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Yes they know nothing of the incident, to which, MS Ford is referring. The fact that they believe her, doesn't change that fact.  Like many here they may be biased in their beliefs.

Except that the first one did indeed "know" of the incident.

"fact"

(12-17-2018, 02:56 PM)bfine32 Wrote: So talking about the Ellison accuser in a thread about Ellison's accuser is a diversion?

I consider it be a diversion from admitting you were wrong and perhaps biased yourself in your statement.

(12-17-2018, 02:56 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I didn't asked was she lying or not. I asked what made MS Ford's accusation to be less likely a lie. Hell maybe Pat was on to something.

You mean like saying she had video proof and then refusing to show it to anyone? I mean if Dr. Ford had said she had hard evidence and then refused to show ti we would be talking apples and apples. Instead we have one woman who claims it happened (with friends that remember the incident willing to cooperate in an investigation) and another who said she has witnesses who refused to cooperate and also did not provide the evidence she said she had.

Again, does that make her "liar"? I guess we would have to see if the evidence ever comes out.

Again, you seem fixated on defending Kavanaugh/attack Ford with a false equivalency and predetermined bias on your part.