Keith Ellison

[*bfine32*]

(12-17-2018, 03:11 PM)GMDino Wrote: Except that the first one did indeed "know" of the incident.

"fact"




I consider it be a diversion from admitting you were wrong and perhaps biased yourself in your statement.


You mean like saying she had video proof and then refusing to show it to anyone?  I mean if Dr. Ford had said she had hard evidence and then refused to show ti we would be talking apples and apples.  Instead we have one woman who claims it happened (with friends that remember the incident willing to cooperate in an investigation) and another who said she has witnesses who refused to cooperate and also did not provide the evidence she said she had.

Again, does that make her "liar"?  I guess we would have to see if the evidence ever comes out.

Again, you seem fixated on defending Kavanaugh/attack Ford with a false equivalency and predetermined bias on your part.

Can't click links at work so I simply went by the investigation findings. I'll respond to you link about who knew and how they knew that Kavs sexually assaulted Ford later. Obviously if Ford has a witness the benefit of the doubt leans in her favor.