Keith Ellison

[*bfine32*]

(12-17-2018, 10:52 PM)fredtoast Wrote: My point obviously went completely over your head.

If a person is lying they are not going to add details that will make it harder to prove their lie is true.  If you are going to claim a person attacked you then you are not going to add additional witnesses to your story that you know will be 100% against you.  If she was lying she would have wanted to keep it to just "my word against his" instead of "my word against 2 of them".

You mean details like when it was, how I got there, how I got home? But none of that matters as long as you assert someone(s) was "there" that has 0 knowledge of the event.

Did the Ellison accuser provide any details?

Your point went over no one's head. All you have done is solidify the point made in the OP and with that your usefulness in this thread has run its course.