Keith Ellison

[GMDino]

(12-18-2018, 11:37 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: You're literally the only one in this thread talking about Kavanaugh.  Desperate spin is desperate.

You brought up his accusation in the first post without mentioning his name by talking about the Cruz harassment incident.

You can continue to deny that is what you meant but it make you look wro....er, well that word you can't bring yourself to use here.

Also I am not "literally" the only one talking about Kavanaugh. Even your friend is in an attempt to show that a man accused and about to be named to a lifetime position on the supreme court is the same as a person running for office in MN and the lack of similar "coverage" means "the left" is hypocritical.

For a man of such a large vocabulary you seem to have used that word wro....uh, not in the right way.

(12-18-2018, 11:37 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Bill Clinton?  Oh, wait, he got away with his abusive behavior too, and you defend him.

You brought him up. Now find the post where I defended him and didn't say he should have stepped down from office. Any post. I double dog dare ya.

Otherwise you might have use "that word" again.

(12-18-2018, 11:37 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I suppose someone would have to make a cogent point about how OP is wrong before people will consider admitting it was wrong.

You asked a question was clearly answered. Yet you and, how you say "those like you" continue to try and prove that democrats only believe one side and not the other based purely on politics.

Again...you are dangerously close to having to use the "W" word...only about yourself.

(12-18-2018, 11:37 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: The talking point has been, and continues to be, "we believe survivors (see plural).  Clearly that mantra is selective in it's implementation.  You are a perfect example of this, you rail against Kavanaugh (again, you're the one who brought him up) and defend Ellison and Clinton.  You don't believe their accusers because you prefer the politics of these particular abusers.  I get why you're so desperate to smear the point made in OP, failing that you'd actually have to face your ugly hypocrisy and that would take moral courage you appear to lack.  Now post a lame gif and pretend you made a counter point.  

Again sir I have not "defended" anyone other than to examine the differences in the cases and how the evidence was and was not produced.

To paraphrase: I get why you're so desperate to defend the point made in OP, failing that you'd actually have to face your ugly hypocrisy and that would take moral courage you appear to lack. 

Hopefully my sincere answers to your misguided interpretation will be met with legitimate answers and not more, how you say, "smears".