12-18-2018, 12:19 PM
(12-18-2018, 11:48 AM)GMDino Wrote: You brought up his accusation in the first post without mentioning his name by talking about the Cruz harassment incident.
No, I brought up the sentiment expressed by the people harassing him. You don't even understand the premise of the thread.
Quote:You can continue to deny that is what you meant but it make you look wro....er, well that word you can't bring yourself to use here.
Again, reading comprehension you lack. (best read in Yoda voice)
Quote:Also I am not "literally" the only one talking about Kavanaugh. Even your friend is in an attempt to show that a man accused and about to be named to a lifetime position on the supreme court is the same as a person running for office in MN and the lack of similar "coverage" means "the left" is hypocritical.
Apologies, you're the one who brought him up, prompting others to speak on him as well.
Quote:For a man of such a large vocabulary you seem to have used that word wro....uh, not in the right way.
I'm sure that sounded clever in your head.
Quote:You brought him up. Now find the post where I defended him and didn't say he should have stepped down from office. Any post. I double dog dare ya.
How many times have I asked you if you believe the Clinton accusers? Numerous times and you always refuse to answer. In regards to Ellison, you certainly haven't said anything about believing his accuser or demanding he step down in this thread, which would be a rather apropos place to dfo so. Matt has the moral courage to do just that, you do not. Or please feel free to do so now.
Do you believe Ellison's accuser and think he should resign his office?
Quote:You asked a question was clearly answered. Yet you and, how you say "those like you" continue to try and prove that democrats only believe one side and not the other based purely on politics.
Again...you are dangerously close to having to use the "W" word...only about yourself.
You clearly answered the thread's topic? I find that difficult to believe as you've demonstrated you don't even know what the thread is about.
Quote:Again sir I have not "defended" anyone other than to examine the differences in the cases and how the evidence was and was not produced.
To paraphrase: I get why you're so desperate to defend the point made in OP, failing that you'd actually have to face your ugly hypocrisy and that would take moral courage you appear to lack.
Again, please put up then, do you believe Ellison's accuser and believe he should step down. As for defending the thread's premise, you'd have to actually know what it is to make this accusation.
Quote:Hopefully my sincere answers to your misguided interpretation will be met with legitimate answers and not more, how you say, "smears".
You using the word sincere is worth reading this entire "response".
