12-18-2018, 02:14 PM
I'm curious why pointing out a policy that was created to help mitigate negative environmental impacts hasn't been implemented yet and is now not going to be is somehow winning this argument against people unhappy with the removal of the policy. Just because it maintains the status quo doesn't mean that people who wanted the policy shouldn't be unhappy. The status quo is shit. We need to be improving our waterways and undercutting policies that are aimed at doing that are harmful to the environment and the people.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
