12-20-2018, 03:06 PM
Yea, not uncommon. The issue in general is most analytic dudes will tell you not to judge guys on sacks, especially in paying the, because sacks are some what of a stat of opportunity. The better stat to judge is pressures because guys holding the ball longer than they should, or simply running into a defender can make sack numbers look better than they should be. The real unforgotten stat is tackle for loss because it is the run equivalent to the sack. For some reason people get caught up on a sack but a sack for a loss of 3 is the same as a tackle for loss of 3 on a run.
