12-27-2018, 11:50 PM
(12-27-2018, 11:33 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: 85 tackles vs 6 Pdef in 2017.
That is tied for 1st in tackles by a CB in the league that year (not really a good thing) and tied for 79th most Pdef by a CB.
If he had much less tackles, the Pdef would be less concerning because then maybe he just wasn't being thrown at (ala Revis 2010), but a CB isn't supposed to have that many tackles and have his hands on the ball that little.
Can't have an entire CB group of people with stone hands. Three first round pick CBs, and they have 0 INT this year, and 4 INT the year before. That's not good. Really really not good.
I worry that keeping both means not getting a real #1 TE. I think either could be an okay-ish #2, but the Bengals O will be in trouble if either of them are pushed into the #1 TE role again.
I guess you are correct about Dennard, thanks for the stats TLL.
That many tackles and not getting many interceptions is not a good thing at all.
Would be fine letting the guy go after seeing this, thought he played better.
To the TE thought, it is a really deep draft for TE's. Think we can pick up one better than Kroft or Uzi in the 3rd or later.
