Real Fake News. Again. Still.

[Dill]

(02-01-2019, 03:08 PM)Stonyhands Wrote: The one setup by Fusion GPS with Fusion employees and paid for by Hillary Clinton’s campaign?  It’s amazing how Trump Jr setup a meeting with the Russian’s AND the very same people responsible for the fake Trump dossier.  

Did you even read the article?

Sure, but that is not a news "article." It's more like a blog on a conspiracy website. 

Your Gateway Pundit has made a number of wild and unsupported claims over the last year, like the Trump Tower meeting was a "hit job" from Hillary.

Natalia Veselnitskaya, who set up the meeting, is not a trained spy, but she is certainly a Russian agent representing the interests of Russian oligarchs. She was in the US lobbying to roll back the Magnitsky Act and funneling documents to the makers of a documentary purporting to offer the "real story" behind the at.

She was in the US as a lawyer working with US lawyers to defend a Russian accused of money laundering.  In relation to this case, she had dinner with one of the co-founders of GPS, Simpson, the evenings before and after the Trump Tower meeting.  Simpson claims there was no mention of the Trump tower meeting and Velnitskaya says she didn't mention it--but this is the nothingburger upon which your "pundit" engineers the theory that GPS engineered the meeting.  Even if she had used GPS for something, it would be in the service of the Kremlin, not GPS. That is why her relation to Kremlin trumps every other "connection" your pundit is trying to forge.

Notice he says Clinton "is suspected" of setting up the meeting.  Passive voice. No agent.  Who suspects?  The Gateway Pundit and Trumpdom. That's all.  Stony, whenever an "article" starts off talking about the "far left" and "the deep state," you want to read whatever follows very carefully and cross check it.  

The Senate Intel Committee does not "corroborate" any claim that Hillary set up Trump jr through GPS. Jeezus. Devon Nunes of the House Intel committee has made some pretty crazy statements, but nothing corrobated there either.

WTF: you claim there is not evidence of conspiracy while at the same time granting this meeting took place, but you buy into these unsupported conspiracy theories. Why?