Trump mocks Elizabeth Warren’s heritage AND #metoo

[*bfine32*]

(02-08-2019, 09:50 PM)Dill Wrote: Go back and locate the emoticon. I put it there to help you find the answer.

If Warren believed she had NA heritage, she wasn't lying.

Without proof she used NA heritage to get a job, and in the face of proof she didn't, it is slander or outright lying to claim she did.

Your link doesn't meet any standard of proof which could overturn the above mentioned points,

but you proceed as if it did. 

You don't really have anything to say about the Warren case until you address the evidence.

I didn't state a rational person must decide if EW was NA; nor to provide and standard of proof.

I simply stated a rational person must decide why she did it.

I'll place you in the population that she really thought NA was the most accurate way to identify herself and in no way did so to gain an advantage (as you refuse to provide an actual answer). I'll wait for some to give you a class on "white privilege" and how EW bastardized it. They'll be along any second I'm sure.