09-23-2015, 11:04 PM
(09-23-2015, 10:38 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: As technically convicted, he has no rights to be violated.
You should read up.
Yeah, I'll keep that in mind :rolls eyes:
I'll suspend debating the Warrantless searches for moment because it'll get deep.
The kid was caught with pics of himself and his girlfriend, but the article doesn't delve into that. She was convicted too. But here's the kicker. The age of consent in NC is 16. Guess how old these two were? These were two consenting individuals sharing pics.
This smells like the DA inflated the charges in order get a lesser conviction.
Even if you don't buy that, where does it end? Is granny in danger of conviction for having naked pics of her grandchildren?
